The updated comments have been propagated to the online webrev http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/7131192/
On Jun 17, 2013, at 11:39 AM, Brian Burkhalter wrote: > I'll update this but without reposting the webrev until I can upload the HTML > version. > > On Jun 17, 2013, at 11:37 AM, Louis Wasserman wrote: > >> You're right, it'd be WIDTH - 1, but since most of the comments refer to >> BITS + 1, that evens out nicely. >> >> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Brian >> Burkhalter<[email protected]> wrote: >> Would it be WIDTH or WIDTH - 1, i.e., with or without the "implied" bit? >> >> On Jun 17, 2013, at 11:32 AM, Louis Wasserman wrote: >> >> > The comments mention SIGNIFICAND_BITS, which I think should probably be >> > SIGNIFICAND_WIDTH? >
