I am sympathetic to this naming issue (actually "indifferent" is more accurate) but it will have to wait until I return from vacation. I have tagged this thread and will follow up when I am back in the office. Please be patient, it will be addressed.
Mike On Jun 20 2013, at 07:10 , Remi Forax wrote: > Yes, a fine idea. > > Rémi > > On 06/20/2013 11:44 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote: >> Like others, I would prefer isNotNull() to notNull(). Mainly for >> consistency, but also for dicoverability is IDE autocomplete (as the >> methods would then be next to one another) >> Stephen >> >> >> On 30 April 2013 23:45, Mike Duigou <mike.dui...@oracle.com> wrote: >>> Hello all; >>> >>> Another changeset coming from the lambda libraries effort. This one is two >>> small additions to the Objects class. The introduced methods are not really >>> intended to be used directly, comparison operators work better in >>> imperative logic, but the methods will be very useful as Predicates. >>> >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/JDK-8013712/0/webrev/ >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Mike >
