On 09/20/2013 11:36 AM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
Hi Kasper,
Can you please log a bug [1] (and also note that ThreadLocal/Random does the
same) ?
My preference would be to get this code in and fix the error reporting
separately.
Even though a minor nuisance, I agree; it would be a simple
practice bug for us (especially me!) to get used to the
newly-externally-accessible bug system.
-Doug
[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/
On Sep 20, 2013, at 8:25 AM, Kasper Nielsen <kaspe...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
This is minor, but I hate it when bounds check does not include the
specified parameters.
Makes it much harder to track down a bug, if all you have is a stack trace.
- Kasper
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Doug Lea <d...@cs.oswego.edu> wrote:
In the course of writing up a report (coming soon) that includes
discussion of SplittableRandom, we had a chance to further
analyze and test things, resulting in a few small improvements. Plus
some internal renamings to better reflect intent.
Plus now with the same initial seed mechanics
discussed a few days ago for ThreadLocalRandom.
Thanks to Paul Sandoz for creating webrevs:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/**browse/JDK-8025136<https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025136>
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~**psandoz/tl/JDK-8025136-SR-**
enhancements/webrev/<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psandoz/tl/JDK-8025136-SR-enhancements/webrev/>
I think we need one more reviewer for it.
-Doug
