On 30/01/2014 14:51, Peter Levart wrote:
It's good to get this change in. If javac were to be changed to reject this code then it need to be changed at the same time (but I guess we wait to see if this is case as it's just not obvious yet).I Just commited the version with no change to ReferenceQueue<Object> line to jdk9/dev. If there is a bug in javac and the code would not compile as is, the change to this line should be committed as part of javac fix, right?
-Alan
