On Apr 3, 2014, at 9:44 PM, John Rose <john.r.r...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Apr 3, 2014, at 6:33 PM, Christian Thalinger > <christian.thalin...@oracle.com> wrote: > >> Of course they are popular because these are the type names. There is no >> type L; it’s an object. I don’t understand why we have to use different >> names just because they are used in other namespaces. This is not a C >> define. > > They stand for JVM signatures as well as basic types. The letters are > signature letters. Can we move on from this? Sure. Push it. > > — John > _______________________________________________ > mlvm-dev mailing list > mlvm-...@openjdk.java.net > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
