Hi Joe If you’re okay with the code; would you be my sponsor for this. We need move forward and push these tests into openjdk repo. Thank you so much Tristan
> On Aug 29, 2014, at 11:21 AM, huizhe wang <huizhe.w...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Hi Tristan, > > Looks good. I left notes in the bug's comment section as a record and status > of the original test development. > > Thanks, > Joe > > On 8/29/2014 9:50 AM, Tristan Yan wrote: >> Hi Joe, Alan and others >> I took over Eric’s last work and did some refactor for his code. Please help >> to review the code change again. >> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tyan/JDK-8051561/webrev.01/ >> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Etyan/JDK-8051561/webrev.01/> >> bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8051561 >> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8051561> >> >> These code has been run with security manager and without security manager >> both and all passed. >> Thank you >> Tristan >> >>> On Jul 25, 2014, at 6:12 AM, Eric Wang <yiming.w...@oracle.com >>> <mailto:yiming.w...@oracle.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Joe, alan and every one >>> >>> I'm working on jaxp functional test colocation which is traced by the bug >>> JDK-8043091 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043091>. >>> We have finished to convert a few suite and the jaxp/xpath tracked by bug >>> JDK-8051561 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8051561> is the first >>> one chosen for public review. >>> >>> Can you please review the webrev below? your comments given would be >>> helpful for our future work. >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ewang/JDK-8051561/webrev.00/ >>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eewang/JDK-8051561/webrev.00/> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Eric >>> >> >
