On 27/11/2014 15:56, Pavel Rappo wrote:
Patrick, as soon as I get feedback from Alan and Paul I'll merge these changes
into the current version.
1. I wonder if it makes sense to provide an additional method where client
specifies CharBuffer to be used?
Moreover if the first argument is CharSequence then we don't even need a buffer:
I would suggest starting out with the simple copy(source, target) and
only add additional variants if there is strong need. In this case, is a
variant that allows the intermediate buffer to be specified be something
that would be widely used?
-Alan
