> Am 27.11.2014 um 17:57 schrieb Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com>: > > On 27/11/2014 15:56, Pavel Rappo wrote: >> Patrick, as soon as I get feedback from Alan and Paul I'll merge these >> changes into the current version. >> >> 1. I wonder if it makes sense to provide an additional method where client >> specifies CharBuffer to be used? >> Moreover if the first argument is CharSequence then we don't even need a >> buffer: >> > I would suggest starting out with the simple copy(source, target) and only > add additional variants if there is strong need. In this case, is a variant > that allows the intermediate buffer to be specified be something that would > be widely used? > > -Alan
In our codebase here we have variants of different buffer sizes, mostly there are some with smaller sizes than the default I took from the Files class. To have the copy function within the JDK instead using a separate library or have this code written over and over again is much more important to me. -Patrick
