On Feb 11, 2015, at 12:15 AM, Martin Buchholz <marti...@google.com> wrote: > The addition of array comparison intrinsics makes sense - I've missed them > myself on occasion. >
Thanks. > I was surprised that System.arraycopy hasn't been specialized for every array > type. > I guess the JIT is good at specializing all callers. > > I don't know whether we will someday regret the explosion of array comparison > methods. > The case for the intrinsic seems more compelling to me. > > (Hopefully someone else will do the real review) > No problem. It's too early for a proper webrev review. For the moment i am seeking comments on the general direction. Thanks, Paul.