On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Chris Hegarty <chris.hega...@oracle.com> wrote:
> > 3) "process reaper”, maybe > “Process-Reaper-“ + monotonically increasing ID ( similar to > ForkJoin worker threads, or other ). But I do accept that this > is the existing name for the reaper threads. > Nothing interesting is supposed to be happening in one of these process reaper threads ... ideally they wouldn't exist at all ..., so giving them a more identifiable name shouldn't help - just add overhead?
