On 24/03/15 19:25, Martin Buchholz wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Chris Hegarty <chris.hega...@oracle.com <mailto:chris.hega...@oracle.com>> wrote: 3) "process reaper”, maybe “Process-Reaper-“ + monotonically increasing ID ( similar to ForkJoin worker threads, or other ). But I do accept that this is the existing name for the reaper threads. Nothing interesting is supposed to be happening in one of these process reaper threads ... ideally they wouldn't exist at all ..., so giving them a more identifiable name shouldn't help - just add overhead?
Ok, that's fine then. -Chris.
