On 23 Apr 2015, at 16:58, Bernd Eckenfels <e...@zusammenkunft.net> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I would use the already established name readFully(byte[]) and 
> readFully(byte[],int,int) to be consistent with DataInputStream.

I purposefully stayed away from the name ‘readFully' as the spec for 
DataInputStream.readFully and the proposed InputStream.readBytes differs. The 
latter does not throw EOFException.

So, currently, on the table we have:
  readBytes
  readAllBytes
  readNBytes ( thanks Alan )

-Chris.

> Gruss
> Bernd

Reply via email to