On 23 Apr 2015, at 16:58, Bernd Eckenfels <e...@zusammenkunft.net> wrote:
> Hello, > > I would use the already established name readFully(byte[]) and > readFully(byte[],int,int) to be consistent with DataInputStream. I purposefully stayed away from the name ‘readFully' as the spec for DataInputStream.readFully and the proposed InputStream.readBytes differs. The latter does not throw EOFException. So, currently, on the table we have: readBytes readAllBytes readNBytes ( thanks Alan ) -Chris. > Gruss > Bernd