On 04/23/2015 06:21 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 23 Apr 2015, at 16:58, Bernd Eckenfels <e...@zusammenkunft.net> wrote:
Hello,
I would use the already established name readFully(byte[]) and
readFully(byte[],int,int) to be consistent with DataInputStream.
I purposefully stayed away from the name ‘readFully' as the spec for
DataInputStream.readFully and the proposed InputStream.readBytes differs. The
latter does not throw EOFException.
So, currently, on the table we have:
readBytes
readAllBytes
readNBytes ( thanks Alan )
What about readLoop ?
...since it's a loop of read()s
Peter
-Chris.
Gruss
Bernd