On 04/23/2015 06:21 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 23 Apr 2015, at 16:58, Bernd Eckenfels <e...@zusammenkunft.net> wrote:

Hello,

I would use the already established name readFully(byte[]) and 
readFully(byte[],int,int) to be consistent with DataInputStream.
I purposefully stayed away from the name ‘readFully' as the spec for 
DataInputStream.readFully and the proposed InputStream.readBytes differs. The 
latter does not throw EOFException.

So, currently, on the table we have:
   readBytes
   readAllBytes
   readNBytes ( thanks Alan )

What about readLoop ?

...since it's a loop of read()s

Peter

-Chris.

Gruss
Bernd

Reply via email to