Why not try to fix *all* the "easy" occurrences in the repo (except for
owners who prefer to fix their own) using an automated script?

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Alexander Stepanov <
alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Could you please review the following fix:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133188/webrev.01
> for
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133188
>
> Just a next portion of "<tt>" tags removed.
>
> specdiff report:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133188/specdiff.util/overview-summary.html
>  - some constructs like
> "<tt>(o==null&nbsp;?&nbsp;e==null&nbsp;:&nbsp;o.equals(e))</tt>"
> were replaced with "{@code Objects.equals(o, e)}"
> (e.g.,
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133188/webrev.01/src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/LinkedList.java.udiff.html);
> - please see JDK-8133188 comments.
>
> Thanks,
> Alexander
>

Reply via email to