Why not try to fix *all* the "easy" occurrences in the repo (except for owners who prefer to fix their own) using an automated script?
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Alexander Stepanov < alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Could you please review the following fix: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133188/webrev.01 > for > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133188 > > Just a next portion of "<tt>" tags removed. > > specdiff report: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133188/specdiff.util/overview-summary.html > - some constructs like > "<tt>(o==null ? e==null : o.equals(e))</tt>" > were replaced with "{@code Objects.equals(o, e)}" > (e.g., > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133188/webrev.01/src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/LinkedList.java.udiff.html); > - please see JDK-8133188 comments. > > Thanks, > Alexander >
