> On 2 Dec 2015, at 22:24, Mandy Chung <mandy.ch...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On Nov 26, 2015, at 1:55 AM, Paul Sandoz <paul.san...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a request for an optimistic review to fork the sun.misc.Unsafe and
>> jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe native method tables so that we can evolve the
>> latter e.g. for VarHandles unsafe work
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psandoz/jdk9/JDK-8143628-unsafe-native-jdk/
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psandoz/jdk9/JDK-8143628-unsafe-native-hotspot/
>
> Looks good. About the tests, would it be better for these tests be placed in
> the jdk repo?
>
That’s my preferred back up plan :-) Something to ponder while waiting for
8143930 (C1 LinearScan...) to be integrated.
> Nit: extra lines in the testAccess method in several new tests can be removed.
>
> 144 static void testAccess(Object base, long offset) {
> 145 // Plain
> 146 {
> 147 UNSAFE.putDouble(base, offset, 1.0d);
> 148 double x = UNSAFE.getDouble(base, offset);
> 149 assertEquals(x, 1.0d, "set double value");
> 150 }
> 151
> 152 // Volatile
> 153 {
> 154 UNSAFE.putDoubleVolatile(base, offset, 2.0d);
> 155 double x = UNSAFE.getDoubleVolatile(base, offset);
> 156 assertEquals(x, 2.0d, "putVolatile double value");
> 157 }
> 158
> 159
> 160
> 161
> 162 }
I could remove empty lines in the template between #if/#end blocks but i find
it harder to read. So i would prefer to leave this as is.
Thanks,
Paul.
