This is "fine", but jsr166 maintainers won't use it - we maintain our own list of tests to run. There's enough collection/concurrency overlap and too much testing ad-hoc-ery in existing jtreg tests. Eg. MOAT should be run for changes to any collection. If this is a test set you personally like, sure go ahead and commit.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Stuart Marks <stuart.ma...@oracle.com> wrote: > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8145139 > > I've appended a patch below; please review. > > Thanks, > > s'marks > > # HG changeset patch > # User smarks > # Date 1449787050 28800 > # Thu Dec 10 14:37:30 2015 -0800 > # Node ID 5b630d0c118b115439672b29aff0d195132d4f96 > # Parent 7f644a5d554a67457f3dd535c4435643d3f65569 > 8145139: clean up jdk_collections and jdk_concurrent test groups > Reviewed-by: XXX > > diff -r 7f644a5d554a -r 5b630d0c118b test/TEST.groups > --- a/test/TEST.groups Wed Dec 09 15:27:21 2015 -0500 > +++ b/test/TEST.groups Thu Dec 10 14:37:30 2015 -0800 > @@ -95,13 +95,10 @@ > -:jdk_concurrent \ > -:jdk_stream > > -# java.util.concurrent (JSR-166) > +# java.util.concurrent > # Maintained by JSR-166 EG (Doug Lea et al) > -# Deque and PriorityQueue are also generally maintained by JSR-166 > jdk_concurrent = \ > - java/util/concurrent \ > - java/util/Deque \ > - java/util/PriorityQueue > + java/util/concurrent > > # Java Collections Framework > jdk_collections = \ > @@ -114,19 +111,22 @@ > java/util/BitSet \ > java/util/Collection \ > java/util/Collections \ > + java/util/Comparator \ > + java/util/Deque \ > java/util/EnumMap \ > java/util/EnumSet \ > - java/util/Comparator \ > - java/util/Iterator \ > java/util/HashMap \ > + java/util/HashSet \ > java/util/Hashtable \ > java/util/IdentityHashMap \ > - java/util/List \ > + java/util/Iterator \ > java/util/LinkedHashMap \ > java/util/LinkedHashSet \ > java/util/LinkedList \ > + java/util/List \ > java/util/Map \ > java/util/NavigableMap \ > + java/util/PriorityQueue \ > java/util/TimSort \ > java/util/TreeMap \ > java/util/Vector \ >
