> On 17 Oct 2016, at 10:53, Claes Redestad <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> On 2016-10-17 19:39, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>> Hi Claes,
>>
>> This looks good.
>
> Thanks!
>
>>
>> Did you consider adding asserts to the package private constructor?
>
> No, might be reasonable. Do you insist? :-)
>
A gentle insistence. It could stop a nasty bug in the future if this method
gets used in other places and incorrect URI instances are produced e.g.:
assert foo(scheme, path);
static boolean foo(String scheme, String path) {
URI u = new URI(scheme + “:/“ + path);
return scheme.equals(u.scheme) && path.equals(u.path);
}
Paul.
