On 22/04/17 14:31, Jonathan Bluett-Duncan wrote: > Your reasoning has personally convinced me that a method like `isEmpty()` > would pull its weight. However, at the risk of bikeshedding, I think it > should be named differently, as `isEmpty()` immediately makes me think that > `findModule()` returns a List, which I'd easily find confusing. > > How about `isNotPresent()` instead?
Ah, bike-shedding! Personally, I much prefer isAbsent() to isNotPresent(), presence and absence being a historically well-sanctioned English language pairing. [n.b. I'll grant that my preference for C18th literature over Comp Sci argot might have swayed my judgement in this matter so I'll leave it to others to sanction or reject that suggestion via a conformantly aligned, textually rendered act of pollification (i.e. go on, post yer +/-1 follow-ups)] regards, Andrew Dinn ----------- Senior Principal Software Engineer Red Hat UK Ltd Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903 Directors: Michael Cunningham, Michael ("Mike") O'Neill, Eric Shander