On May 8, 2017, at 5:07 PM, Joseph D. Darcy <joe.da...@oracle.com> wrote:
> This is a case of "jmh results or it isn't faster." [1] > > It is challenging to evaluate such changes as being universally faster > without benchmark results, especially for small methods like this. Without > compelling performance support, my preference would be to leave the current > Java implementation as-is, especially when there are VM intrinsics on many > platforms. I concur. Brian
