On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:54 PM Martin Buchholz <marti...@google.com> wrote: > > Being able to do better here is very impressive. > > I took a quick look and found two things that a paranoid benchmarker like > myself would not have done: > - write the benchmark in scala instead of boring java > - use jdk8 instead of "head" (i.e. jdk10) > > I would also have benchmarked against the intrinsified version to see how it > did.
I had trouble building jmh, so used a setup I already had working. I added a java runner in https://github.com/isaacl/BitCountJDK, would you be willing to run a test against head to get a second data point?
