Hi Roman,

The webrev seems to have gotten moved as I was reviewing it and now it is gone 
:-)

> On May 31, 2017, at 8:06 AM, Roman Grigoriadi <roman.grigori...@oracle.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> New webrev can be found here:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/jaxws-integrations/8176508/02/ 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/jaxws-integrations/8176508/02/>
> 
> Previous review comments have been addressed.
> 
> New changes since last webrev upload:
> 
> Few “opens xxx to java.xml.bind” in the module-info of java.xml.ws with 
> descriptions of files in java.xml.ws, which calls JAXBContext#newInstance. 
> 
> JAXB-API:
>  - JAXBContext.java - deprecated implementation discovery with 
> jaxb.properties resource. 
>  - ContextFinder when called with String contextPath now tries to resolve 
> jaxb.properties with Class#getResource if ClassLoader#getResource fails due 
> to insufficient openness of jaxb.properties resource package.
>  - better JAXBException message when package of jaxb classes is not open to 
> java.xml.bind
> 
> JAXB-RI:
>  - fixed escaping newlines when using bundled jaxws transport.
> 
> SAAJ-RI
>  - fixed TCK test failures
> 
> JAXWS-RI
>  - fixed parsing wsdl in secure mode
> 
> We have one JCK runtime test failure, which should be probably fixed in 
> tests, I have created issue for it: 
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JCK-7308397 
> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JCK-7308397>
> 
> Please review.
> 
> Thanks,
> Roman
> 
>> On 8 May 2017, at 22:38, Lance Andersen <lance.ander...@oracle.com 
>> <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Roman,
>> 
>> I made a pass through the webrev and have the following feedback:
>> 
>> 
>> src/java.xml.ws/share/classes/com/sun/xml/internal/messaging/saaj/soap/StaxLazySourceBridge.java
>>  and several files  - which follow in the webrev, have formatting issues 
>> with the newly added @override and existing @overrides and should probably 
>> be cleaned up
>> 
>> src/java.xml.ws/share/classes/com/sun/xml/internal/messaging/saaj/soap/impl/BodyElementImpl.java
>>  - can 960 -962 be deleted
>> 
>> src/java.xml.ws/share/classes/com/sun/xml/internal/ws/util/version.properties
>>  - The copyright was reverted.  Also what happens to the svn info in this 
>> file with the move to github?
>> 
>> src/java.xml.ws/share/classes/javax/xml/soap/package-info.java -  I would 
>> use &trade; for TM
>> 
>> src/java.xml.ws/share/classes/javax/xml/ws/Service.java - See comments 
>> starting at 230 seem off
>> 
>> src/java.xml.ws/share/classes/javax/xml/ws/WebServiceRef.java -  I would 
>> make the comments starting at 139 be consistent with the other comments 
>> 
>> src/jdk.xml.bind/share/classes/com/sun/tools/internal/jxc/*.properties - the 
>> copyright date was reverted
>> 
>> src/jdk.xml.bind/share/classes/module-info.java  should already be updated 
>> in the workspace
>> 
>> src/jdk.xml.ws/share/classes/com/sun/tools/internal/ws/processor/ProcessorException.java
>>  - The copyright should be updated to 2017
>> 
>> src/jdk.xml.ws/share/classes/com/sun/tools/internal/ws/util/WSDLParseException.java
>>  -  the copyright was reverted
>> 
>> src/jdk.xml.ws/share/classes/com/sun/tools/internal/ws/wsdl/framework/ParseException.java
>>  - the copyright was reverted 
>> 
>> src/jdk.xml.ws/share/classes/com/sun/tools/internal/ws/wsdl/framework/ValidationException.java
>>  - the copyright was reverted
>> 
>> src/jdk.xml.ws/share/classes/module-info.java - this was already updated in 
>> the workspace
>> 
>> src/java.xml.bind/share/classes/javax/xml/bind/ModuleUtil.java - the 
>> copyright should only be 2017
>> 
>> src/java.xml.ws/share/classes/com/sun/xml/internal/ws/policy/sourcemodel/attach/ContextClassloaderLocalMessages.java.
>>  - the copyright should only be 2017
>> 
>> src/jdk.xml.ws/share/classes/com/sun/tools/internal/ws/resources/NewmessagesMessages.java
>>  - the copyright should only be 2017
>> 
>> src/jdk.xml.ws/share/classes/com/sun/tools/internal/ws/resources/newmessages.properties
>>  - this is in the workspace already
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On May 3, 2017, at 12:49 PM, Roman Grigoriadi <roman.grigori...@oracle.com 
>>> <mailto:roman.grigori...@oracle.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> you can find new web rev here:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/jaxws-integrations/8176508/01/ 
>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/jaxws-integrations/8176508/01/> 
>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/jaxws-integrations/8176508/01/ 
>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/jaxws-integrations/8176508/01/>>
>>> 
>>> Previous review comments are addressed. 
>>> 
>>>> The change to version.properties reminds me to ask if there is anything in 
>>>> the jaxws repo to indicate the version of the JAX-* components? It's often 
>>>> difficult to determine what bits are in the JDK vs. the upstream project.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Version as in our Maven project is 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT for JAX-WS at the time we 
>>> are syncing. Subcomponents (SAAJ, JAXB mainly) are promoted, for example 
>>> in 
>>> jdk/jaxws/src/jdk.xml.bind/share/classes/com/sun/tools/internal/xjc/MessageBundle.properties
>>> There is:
>>> # for JDK integration - include version in source zip
>>> jaxb.jdk.version=2.3.0-b170412.1723
>>> 
>>> We can add another version.properties file with versions of all JAX-* 
>>> components. We may also change version from 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT to something 
>>> unique like 2.3.0-bXXXXXX.XXXX before sync and put it to maven promoted 
>>> repo.
>>> 
>>> Roman
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 12 Mar 2017, at 16:14, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com 
>>>> <mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 12/03/2017 14:39, Roman Grigoriadi wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please review standalone JAXB/JAXWS changes, synced to jdk/jaxws repo.
>>>>> 
>>>>> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8176508 
>>>>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8176508>
>>>>> Webrev: 
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/jaxws-integrations/8176508/00/ 
>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/jaxws-integrations/8176508/00/>
>>>>> 
>>>> I skimmed the changes and have a few comments (I'm sure Lance or someone 
>>>> else will do a more detailed review).
>>>> 
>>>> In JAXBContext then "must be open to the java.xml.bind module" should be 
>>>> "must be open to at least the java.xml.bind module" so as to cover the 
>>>> case that the package is opened unconditionally or to java.xml.bind and 
>>>> other modules. In addition, include "at least" makes it consistent with 
>>>> other wording that we have agreed for other areas.
>>>> 
>>>> In MailcapCommandMap then the following doesn't seem right for the class 
>>>> description:
>>>> 
>>>> 59  * (Where <i>java.home</i> is the value of the "java.home" System 
>>>> property
>>>> 60  * and <i>conf</i> is the directory named "conf" if it exists,
>>>> 61  * otherwise the directory named "lib"; the "conf" directory was
>>>> 62  * introduced in JDK 1.9.)
>>>> 
>>>> It might be simpler to just have javadoc specify that it attepts to locate 
>>>> the `mailcap` file in the Java run-time image and then add an @implNote 
>>>> with the details as to where it looks for specific runtime releases.
>>>> 
>>>> I see the new source file ModuleUtil is using java.util.StringTokenizer. 
>>>> It's use in new code has been discouraged for many years and maybe this 
>>>> could start out using String.split rather than the legacy class.
>>>> 
>>>> The change to version.properties reminds me to ask if there is anything in 
>>>> the jaxws repo to indicate the version of the JAX-* components? It's often 
>>>> difficult to determine what bits are in the JDK vs. the upstream project.
>>>> 
>>>> -Alan
>>> 
>> 
>> <oracle_sig_logo.gif> 
>> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
>>  <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif> 
>> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
>>  <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance Andersen| 
>> Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
>> Oracle Java Engineering 
>> 1 Network Drive 
>> Burlington, MA 01803
>> lance.ander...@oracle.com <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com>

 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif> 
<http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance Andersen| 
Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering 
1 Network Drive 
Burlington, MA 01803
lance.ander...@oracle.com <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com>



Reply via email to