> On 1 Jun 2017, at 20:08, Lance Andersen <lance.ander...@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Aleks,
> 
> Its all good.  I don’t suppose there is a webrev of the diffs from 01 to 02 
> (or an easy way to see what changed)?

Unfortunately no list of changed files, just a description of changes in my 
last message. 
In addition to those fix for JDK-8176741 is included in this upload and some 
new messages (modeler*.properties, wscompile*.properties) 

Maybe I can produce some diff of changed files from git history of the 
standalone (probably still many files) if that would be of any help. We may try 
to sync in a smaller parts next time.

Roman


> 
> Best
> Lance
>> On Jun 1, 2017, at 2:06 PM, Aleks Efimov <aleksej.efi...@oracle.com 
>> <mailto:aleksej.efi...@oracle.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> I'm sorry Lance! I'm uploading new version of the webrev right now to the 
>> same location :-) It should be on-line soon =)
>> 
>> Best,
>> Aleksei
>> 
>> On 06/01/2017 06:34 PM, Lance Andersen wrote:
>>> Hi Roman,
>>> 
>>> The webrev seems to have gotten moved as I was reviewing it and now it is 
>>> gone :-)
>>> 
>>>> On May 31, 2017, at 8:06 AM, Roman Grigoriadi <roman.grigori...@oracle.com 
>>>> <mailto:roman.grigori...@oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> New webrev can be found here:
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/jaxws-integrations/8176508/02/ 
>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/jaxws-integrations/8176508/02/> 
>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/jaxws-integrations/8176508/02/ 
>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/jaxws-integrations/8176508/02/>>
>>>> 
>>>> Previous review comments have been addressed.
>>>> 
>>>> New changes since last webrev upload:
>>>> 
>>>> Few “opens xxx to java.xml.bind” in the module-info of java.xml.ws with 
>>>> descriptions of files in java.xml.ws, which calls JAXBContext#newInstance.
>>>> 
>>>> JAXB-API:
>>>>  - JAXBContext.java - deprecated implementation discovery with 
>>>> jaxb.properties resource.
>>>>  - ContextFinder when called with String contextPath now tries to resolve 
>>>> jaxb.properties with Class#getResource if ClassLoader#getResource fails 
>>>> due to insufficient openness of jaxb.properties resource package.
>>>>  - better JAXBException message when package of jaxb classes is not open 
>>>> to java.xml.bind
>>>> 
>>>> JAXB-RI:
>>>>  - fixed escaping newlines when using bundled jaxws transport.
>>>> 
>>>> SAAJ-RI
>>>>  - fixed TCK test failures
>>>> 
>>>> JAXWS-RI
>>>>  - fixed parsing wsdl in secure mode
>>>> 
>>>> We have one JCK runtime test failure, which should be probably fixed in 
>>>> tests, I have created issue for it: 
>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JCK-7308397 
>>>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JCK-7308397> 
>>>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JCK-7308397 
>>>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JCK-7308397>>
>>>> 
>>>> Please review.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Roman
>>>> 
>>>>> On 8 May 2017, at 22:38, Lance Andersen <lance.ander...@oracle.com 
>>>>> <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com> <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com 
>>>>> <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Roman,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I made a pass through the webrev and have the following feedback:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> src/java.xml.ws/share/classes/com/sun/xml/internal/messaging/saaj/soap/StaxLazySourceBridge.java
>>>>>  and several files  - which follow in the webrev, have formatting issues 
>>>>> with the newly added @override and existing @overrides and should 
>>>>> probably be cleaned up
>>>>> 
>>>>> src/java.xml.ws/share/classes/com/sun/xml/internal/messaging/saaj/soap/impl/BodyElementImpl.java
>>>>>  - can 960 -962 be deleted
>>>>> 
>>>>> src/java.xml.ws/share/classes/com/sun/xml/internal/ws/util/version.properties
>>>>>  - The copyright was reverted.  Also what happens to the svn info in this 
>>>>> file with the move to github?
>>>>> 
>>>>> src/java.xml.ws/share/classes/javax/xml/soap/package-info.java -  I would 
>>>>> use &trade; for TM
>>>>> 
>>>>> src/java.xml.ws/share/classes/javax/xml/ws/Service.java - See comments 
>>>>> starting at 230 seem off
>>>>> 
>>>>> src/java.xml.ws/share/classes/javax/xml/ws/WebServiceRef.java -  I would 
>>>>> make the comments starting at 139 be consistent with the other comments
>>>>> 
>>>>> src/jdk.xml.bind/share/classes/com/sun/tools/internal/jxc/*.properties - 
>>>>> the copyright date was reverted
>>>>> 
>>>>> src/jdk.xml.bind/share/classes/module-info.java  should already be 
>>>>> updated in the workspace
>>>>> 
>>>>> src/jdk.xml.ws/share/classes/com/sun/tools/internal/ws/processor/ProcessorException.java
>>>>>  - The copyright should be updated to 2017
>>>>> 
>>>>> src/jdk.xml.ws/share/classes/com/sun/tools/internal/ws/util/WSDLParseException.java
>>>>>  -  the copyright was reverted
>>>>> 
>>>>> src/jdk.xml.ws/share/classes/com/sun/tools/internal/ws/wsdl/framework/ParseException.java
>>>>>  - the copyright was reverted
>>>>> 
>>>>> src/jdk.xml.ws/share/classes/com/sun/tools/internal/ws/wsdl/framework/ValidationException.java
>>>>>  - the copyright was reverted
>>>>> 
>>>>> src/jdk.xml.ws/share/classes/module-info.java - this was already updated 
>>>>> in the workspace
>>>>> 
>>>>> src/java.xml.bind/share/classes/javax/xml/bind/ModuleUtil.java - the 
>>>>> copyright should only be 2017
>>>>> 
>>>>> src/java.xml.ws/share/classes/com/sun/xml/internal/ws/policy/sourcemodel/attach/ContextClassloaderLocalMessages.java.
>>>>>  - the copyright should only be 2017
>>>>> 
>>>>> src/jdk.xml.ws/share/classes/com/sun/tools/internal/ws/resources/NewmessagesMessages.java
>>>>>  - the copyright should only be 2017
>>>>> 
>>>>> src/jdk.xml.ws/share/classes/com/sun/tools/internal/ws/resources/newmessages.properties
>>>>>  - this is in the workspace already
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On May 3, 2017, at 12:49 PM, Roman Grigoriadi 
>>>>>> <roman.grigori...@oracle.com <mailto:roman.grigori...@oracle.com> 
>>>>>> <mailto:roman.grigori...@oracle.com 
>>>>>> <mailto:roman.grigori...@oracle.com>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> you can find new web rev here:
>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/jaxws-integrations/8176508/01/ 
>>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/jaxws-integrations/8176508/01/> 
>>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/jaxws-integrations/8176508/01/ 
>>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/jaxws-integrations/8176508/01/>> 
>>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/jaxws-integrations/8176508/01/ 
>>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/jaxws-integrations/8176508/01/> 
>>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/jaxws-integrations/8176508/01/ 
>>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/jaxws-integrations/8176508/01/>>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Previous review comments are addressed.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The change to version.properties reminds me to ask if there is anything 
>>>>>>> in the jaxws repo to indicate the version of the JAX-* components? It's 
>>>>>>> often difficult to determine what bits are in the JDK vs. the upstream 
>>>>>>> project.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Version as in our Maven project is 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT for JAX-WS at the time 
>>>>>> we are syncing. Subcomponents (SAAJ, JAXB mainly) are promoted, for 
>>>>>> example
>>>>>> in 
>>>>>> jdk/jaxws/src/jdk.xml.bind/share/classes/com/sun/tools/internal/xjc/MessageBundle.properties
>>>>>> There is:
>>>>>> # for JDK integration - include version in source zip
>>>>>> jaxb.jdk.version=2.3.0-b170412.1723
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We can add another version.properties file with versions of all JAX-* 
>>>>>> components. We may also change version from 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT to something 
>>>>>> unique like 2.3.0-bXXXXXX.XXXX before sync and put it to maven promoted 
>>>>>> repo.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Roman
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 12 Mar 2017, at 16:14, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com 
>>>>>>> <mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com> <mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com 
>>>>>>> <mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 12/03/2017 14:39, Roman Grigoriadi wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Please review standalone JAXB/JAXWS changes, synced to jdk/jaxws repo.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8176508 
>>>>>>>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8176508> 
>>>>>>>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8176508 
>>>>>>>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8176508>>
>>>>>>>> Webrev: 
>>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/jaxws-integrations/8176508/00/ 
>>>>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/jaxws-integrations/8176508/00/> 
>>>>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/jaxws-integrations/8176508/00/ 
>>>>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/jaxws-integrations/8176508/00/>>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I skimmed the changes and have a few comments (I'm sure Lance or 
>>>>>>> someone else will do a more detailed review).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> In JAXBContext then "must be open to the java.xml.bind module" should 
>>>>>>> be "must be open to at least the java.xml.bind module" so as to cover 
>>>>>>> the case that the package is opened unconditionally or to java.xml.bind 
>>>>>>> and other modules. In addition, include "at least" makes it consistent 
>>>>>>> with other wording that we have agreed for other areas.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> In MailcapCommandMap then the following doesn't seem right for the 
>>>>>>> class description:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 59  * (Where <i>java.home</i> is the value of the "java.home" System 
>>>>>>> property
>>>>>>> 60  * and <i>conf</i> is the directory named "conf" if it exists,
>>>>>>> 61  * otherwise the directory named "lib"; the "conf" directory was
>>>>>>> 62  * introduced in JDK 1.9.)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> It might be simpler to just have javadoc specify that it attepts to 
>>>>>>> locate the `mailcap` file in the Java run-time image and then add an 
>>>>>>> @implNote with the details as to where it looks for specific runtime 
>>>>>>> releases.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I see the new source file ModuleUtil is using 
>>>>>>> java.util.StringTokenizer. It's use in new code has been discouraged 
>>>>>>> for many years and maybe this could start out using String.split rather 
>>>>>>> than the legacy class.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The change to version.properties reminds me to ask if there is anything 
>>>>>>> in the jaxws repo to indicate the version of the JAX-* components? It's 
>>>>>>> often difficult to determine what bits are in the JDK vs. the upstream 
>>>>>>> project.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -Alan
>>>>> <oracle_sig_logo.gif> 
>>>>> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif 
>>>>> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>>
>>>>>  <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif 
>>>>> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>> 
>>>>> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif 
>>>>> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>>
>>>>>  <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif 
>>>>> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>>Lance Andersen| 
>>>>> Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
>>>>> Oracle Java Engineering
>>>>> 1 Network Drive
>>>>> Burlington, MA 01803
>>>>> lance.ander...@oracle.com <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com> 
>>>>> <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com>>
>>>  <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif 
>>> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>>
>>>  <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif 
>>> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>> 
>>> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif 
>>> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>>
>>>  <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif 
>>> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>>Lance Andersen| 
>>> Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
>>> Oracle Java Engineering
>>> 1 Network Drive
>>> Burlington, MA 01803
>>> lance.ander...@oracle.com <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com> 
>>> <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> <oracle_sig_logo.gif> 
> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
>  <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif> 
> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
>  <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance Andersen| 
> Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
> Oracle Java Engineering 
> 1 Network Drive 
> Burlington, MA 01803
> lance.ander...@oracle.com <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com>
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to