> On Jun 9, 2017, at 9:26 AM, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote: > > > > On 09/06/2017 14:15, Lance Andersen wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This patches addresses the broken link reported in JDK-8181832 >> >> ———— >> $ hg diff >> diff -r 67ad6b89dd96 >> src/java.sql.rowset/share/classes/javax/sql/rowset/spi/package.html >> --- a/src/java.sql.rowset/share/classes/javax/sql/rowset/spi/package.html >> Wed Jun 07 15:05:35 2017 -0400 >> +++ b/src/java.sql.rowset/share/classes/javax/sql/rowset/spi/package.html >> Fri Jun 09 09:13:49 2017 -0400 >> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ >> techniques for maintaining the integrity of data. However, specific >> standards >> groups have considered offering XML-based synchronization. For details, see >> <PRE> >> - <a href="http://www.syncml.org";>http://www.syncml.org</a> >> + <a >> href="http://www.openmobilealliance.org/wp/Affiliates/SyncML.html";>http://www.openmobilealliance.org/wp/Affiliates/SyncML.html</a> >> </PRE> >> > Would it be better to drop this paragraph and link completely? > > I also wonder if the paragraphs about the RI should move into their own > section so that it is clear that they are implementation specific - users of > this API can't assume the two providers discussed are present.
I think for 9, I would prefer to just address the broken link and look to revisit for 10. This has been documented this way since JDK 5, so I think if I am going to make changes, I would like to spend some more time thinking about it. Is that acceptable? Best Lance > > -Alan <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037 Oracle Java Engineering 1 Network Drive Burlington, MA 01803 lance.ander...@oracle.com <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com>
