Hello!
According to `List.sort` specification [1] "This list must be modifiable".
According to `Collections.emptyList` specification [2] "Returns an
empty list (immutable)."
So I assume that `List.sort` cannot be called on
`Collections.emptyList` result. However in fact this call is allowed
doing nothing. Is this behavior documented somehow? Can I rely that it
will not change in future Java updates?
It's even more strange with `Collections.singletonList` [3] which
"Returns an immutable list containing only the specified object".
Obviously I cannot do:
List<String> list = Collections.singletonList("foo");
ListIterator<String> it = list.listIterator();
it.next();
it.set("bar"); // UOE
However list.sort(null) works perfectly. On the other hand [1] clearly says:
Throws: UnsupportedOperationException - if the list's list-iterator
does not support the set operation.
To me it seems that emptyList and (especially) singletonList
implementation does not follow the specification. Am I missing
something?
With best regards,
Tagir Valeev.
[1]
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/api/java/util/List.html#sort-java.util.Comparator-
[2]
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/api/java/util/Collections.html#emptyList--
[3]
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/api/java/util/Collections.html#singletonList-T-
