On 15/11/2017 10:03, Andrej Golovnin wrote:
Hi Bernd,
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 7:04 AM, Bernd Eckenfels <e...@zusammenkunft.net> wrote:
I would however vote for allowing an empty list to be sorted. This is such a
common case to return a replacement empty list that it will not only introduce
changed behavior but also forces ugly code.
I think we would need to write ugly code in any case as Java 9 has now
two empty list implementations: Collections.emptyList() and List.of().
Collections.emptyList().sort() does not throw an exception.
List.of().sort() throws an exception.
There are indeed inconsistencies and likely other examples due to List
implementations not overriding sort (and so dependent on the default
implementation which cannot say if an empty or already sorted list is
modifiable or not). As Collections.emptyList() is around a long time
then it would likely break existing code to change it now. It might be
saner to change List0 to be consistent. In any case, the sort javadoc
will likely need some adjustment to allow for long standing behavior.
-Alan
