Fix is fine, trivial and I do not think there is any risk attached to it. I
am not in any position to comment whether this is P1. Copyright year needs

Kind Regards, Thomas

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Volker Simonis <>

> Hi,
> can I please get a review for the following tiny fix:
> The new Java 10 specification makes the 'java.vendor.version' property
> mandatory [1] but the current implementations doesn't allow to set it
> to an empty string.
> Currently, if we don't configure the build with
> --with-vendor-version=XXX the 'java.vendor.version' property won't be
> set at all, which violates the spec. Setting it to an empty string
> will be ignored and has the same behavior like not setting it at all.
> This also makes default OpenJDK builds (which haven't been configured
> with --with-vendor-version non-compliant).
> The fix is trivial: unconditionally set the 'java.vendor.version'
> property to the value of VENDOR_VERSION_STRING in
>, even if VENDOR_VERSION_STRING is the empty
> string (which is the default if --with-vendor-version wasn't given at
> config time).
> Thank you and best regards,
> Volker
> [1]
> spec/apidiffs/java/lang/System-report.html#method:getProperties()

Reply via email to