On 04/10/2018 08:42 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: > On 09/04/2018 18:58, Paul Sandoz wrote: >> I am supportive of this change (the risk to impacting order-dependent >> stateful MH filter code is >> smaller than the risk of hitting a string concatenation bug). (We erred on >> the side of this being >> a bug and not being a spec change given the pseudo-code in the Java doc.) >> >> IIRC this will require a nod of approval from the project lead. >> >> Paul. > I think this is a CSR for Java SE 11 first as it adds a testable assertion to > the spec and also > changes existing behavior.
Ok, fine! Paul, can you submit the CSR for this? -Aleksey
