On 05/20/18 00:54, John Rose wrote:
The phrase “incorrect results” in List cannot be carte blanche to add checks where we are afraid the programmer might have made an error even if we cannot prove one; that would be just officious mind-reading.
+1I'm all for adding checks that prevent programming errors, but not for the price of preventing a legal and perfectly logical usecase, such as the one Martin has demonstrated.
Regards, Peter