On 05/20/18 00:54, John Rose wrote:
The phrase “incorrect results” in
List cannot be carte blanche to add checks where we are afraid the
programmer might have made an error even if we cannot prove one; that
would be just officious mind-reading.
+1

I'm all for adding checks that prevent programming errors, but not for the price of preventing a legal and perfectly logical usecase, such as the one Martin has demonstrated.

Regards, Peter

Reply via email to