On May 21, 2018, at 8:01 AM, Brian Burkhalter <[email protected]> wrote:
> why not use the “expectedExceptions” optional element [1] Actually forget that comment: I did not look at the Patterns part closely enough. Looks good. Brian
On May 21, 2018, at 8:01 AM, Brian Burkhalter <[email protected]> wrote:
> why not use the “expectedExceptions” optional element [1] Actually forget that comment: I did not look at the Patterns part closely enough. Looks good. Brian