Hi Brian,
If there were more cases of successful vs exception cases, I would
probably have created
two data providers and corresponding tests. But it seemed like overkill
in this case.
I'll comment the cases as successful vs exception.
Thanks, Roger
On 5/21/18 11:02 AM, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
On May 21, 2018, at 8:01 AM, Brian Burkhalter
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
why not use the “expectedExceptions” optional element [1]
Actually forget that comment: I did not look at the Patterns part
closely enough.
Looks good.
Brian
