> On Jun 15, 2018, at 2:24 PM, Martin Buchholz <marti...@google.com> wrote:
>
> Still looks correct, but I might keep looking for something more elegant.
> What bothers me a little now is
>
> 1290 long word = words[u] & (WORD_MASK << i);
>
> which is part of the initial setup and is not necessary on each iteration.
>
I was looking at this too. From a performance perspective i am not very
concerned. Aesthetically it bothers me, but at this point i am willing to
declare victory and patch later if there is a better way.
Paul.
