+1 On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Paul Sandoz <paul.san...@oracle.com> wrote:
> > > On Jun 15, 2018, at 2:24 PM, Martin Buchholz <marti...@google.com> wrote: > > Still looks correct, but I might keep looking for something more elegant. > What bothers me a little now is > > 1290 long word = words[u] & (WORD_MASK << i); > > > which is part of the initial setup and is not necessary on each iteration. > > > I was looking at this too. From a performance perspective i am not very > concerned. Aesthetically it bothers me, but at this point i am willing to > declare victory and patch later if there is a better way. > > Paul. >
