Hi Lance, > On Jul 18, 2019, at 12:34 PM, Lance Andersen <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> One thing which should be considered as an alternative would be not to check >> for null at all in these constructors but update the subclass constructor >> specifications to override the class documentation and indicate that the >> underlying stream parameter may be null. > > I think this might be the better way to go..
Agreed. I therefore withdraw this patch and will use this issue for the back out. Thanks, Brian
