On 1/15/20 6:48 PM, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote: > That said, even w/o that performance fix, I wouldn't expect the memory > access API to be 4x slower. I'd start by dropping the acquire() [which > you probably don't need and it's doing a CAS], and moving to indexed var > handle (by replicating the benchmark code linked above) and see if that > works better.
OK, I never found the indexed var handle. -- Andrew Haley (he/him) Java Platform Lead Engineer Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com> https://keybase.io/andrewhaley EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
