Hi Mandy,

On 28/03/2020 8:29 am, Mandy Chung wrote:
Hi Vicente,

hasNestmateAccess is about VM supports static nestmates on JDK release >= 11.

However this is about javac --release 14 and the compiled classes may run on JDK 14 that lambda and string concat spin classes that are not nestmates. I have a patch with Jan's help:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/valhalla/webrevs/8171335/webrev-javac-target-release-14/index.html

+             /**
+ * The VM does not support access across nested classes (8010319).
+              * Were that ever to change, this should be removed.
+              */
+             boolean isPrivateInOtherClass() {

I'm not at all sure what this means - access across different nests? (I'm not even sure what that means.)

Thanks,
David
-----


(you can apply the above patch on valhalla repo "nestmates" branch)

About testing, I wanted to run BridgeMethodsForLambdaTest and TestLambdaBytecode test with --release 14 but it turns out not straight-forward.  Any help would be appreciated.

thanks
Mandy

On 3/27/20 2:15 PM, Vicente Romero wrote:
Hi Mandy,

The patch for nestmates [1] could be used as a reference. There a new method was added to class `com.sun.tools.javac.jvm.Target`, named: `hasNestmateAccess` which checks if a target is ready for nestmates or not. I think that you can follow a similar approach here.

Thanks,
Vicente

[1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/2f2af62dfac7

On 3/27/20 12:29 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
Hi Jan,

Good point.  The javac change only applies to JDK 15 and later and the lambda proxy class is not a nestmate when running on JDK 14 or earlier.

I probably need the help from langtools team to fix this.  I'll give it a try.

Mandy

On 3/27/20 4:31 AM, Jan Lahoda wrote:
Hi Mandy,

Regarding the javac changes - should those be switched on/off depending the Target? Or, if one compiles with e.g. --release 14, will the newly generated output still work on JDK 14?

Jan

On 27. 03. 20 0:57, Mandy Chung wrote:
Please review the implementation of JEP 371: Hidden Classes. The main changes are in core-libs and hotspot runtime area.  Small changes are made in javac, VM compiler (intrinsification of Class::isHiddenClass), JFR, JDI, and jcmd.  CSR [1]has been reviewed and is in the finalized state (see specdiff and javadoc below for reference).

Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/valhalla/webrevs/hidden-classes/webrev.03

Hidden class is created via `Lookup::defineHiddenClass`. From JVM's point
of view, a hidden class is a normal class except the following:

- A hidden class has no initiating class loader and is not registered in any dictionary. - A hidden class has a name containing an illegal character `Class::getName` returns `p.Foo/0x1234` whereas `GetClassSignature` returns "Lp/Foo.0x1234;". - A hidden class is not modifiable, i.e. cannot be redefined or retransformed. JVM TI IsModifableClass returns false on a hidden. - Final fields in a hidden class is "final".  The value of final fields cannot be overriden via reflection. setAccessible(true) can still be called on reflected objects representing final fields in a hidden class and its access check will be suppressed but only have read-access (i.e. can do Field::getXXX but not setXXX).

Brief summary of this patch:

1. A new Lookup::defineHiddenClass method is the API to create a hidden class. 2. A new Lookup.ClassOption enum class defines NESTMATE and STRONG option that
    can be specified when creating a hidden class.
3. A new Class::isHiddenClass method tests if a class is a hidden class. 4. Field::setXXX method will throw IAE on a final field of a hidden class
    regardless of the value of the accessible flag.
5. JVM_LookupDefineClass is the new JVM entry point for Lookup::defineClass
    and defineHiddenClass to create a class from the given bytes.
6. ClassLoaderData implementation is not changed.  There is one primary CLD     that holds the classes strongly referenced by its defining loader. There
    can be zero or more additional CLDs - one per weak class.
7. Nest host determination is updated per revised JVMS 5.4.4. Access control     check no longer throws LinkageError but instead it will throw IAE with     a clear message if a class fails to resolve/validate the nest host declared
    in NestHost/NestMembers attribute.
8. JFR, jcmd, JDI are updated to support hidden classes.
9. update javac LambdaToMethod as lambda proxy starts using nestmates
    and generate a bridge method to desuger a method reference to a protected
    method in its supertype in a different package

This patch also updates StringConcatFactory, LambdaMetaFactory, and LambdaForms to use hidden classes.  The webrev includes changes in nashorn to hidden class
and I will update the webrev if JEP 372 removes it any time soon.

We uncovered a bug in Lookup::defineClass spec throws LinkageError and intends to have the newly created class linked.  However, the implementation in 14
does not link the class.  A separate CSR [2] proposes to update the
implementation to match the spec.  This patch fixes the implementation.

The spec update on JVM TI, JDI and Instrumentation will be done as
a separate RFE [3].  This patch includes new tests for JVM TI and
java.instrument that validates how the existing APIs work for hidden classes.

javadoc/specdiff
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/valhalla/webrevs/hidden-classes/api/ http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/valhalla/webrevs/hidden-classes/specdiff/

JVMS 5.4.4 change:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/valhalla/webrevs/hidden-classes/Draft-JVMS-HiddenClasses.pdf

CSR:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8238359

Thanks
Mandy
[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8238359
[2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240338
[3] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8230502



Reply via email to