On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 9:26 PM Eirik Bjørsnøs <eir...@gmail.com> wrote:
This translates to a Petclinic startup improvement of 91 ms or 1.4 percent > (assuming single-threaded class loading here). > > I expect that this can be improved further with a more clever use of hash > functions. Specifically it would be great to skip earlier in case of a > miss, before the String to byte[] encoding happens. > By using the String name hash before encoding it to bytes, savings increased to 270 ms, which represents a 4.6 percent performance improvement on Spring Petclinic startup. Eirik.
