>The only reason why a 0 was observed, was because the cgroup interface >files were missing and the old code mapped that to a 0. That's no >longer the case and, thus, it seems it would make the code clearer if >it wouldn't be there any more. > >I don't feel strongly about this, though, and can just drop this patch.
Hi Severin, thanks for clarification, I'm fine with the patch ! Best regards, Matthias
