On Thu, 2020-07-30 at 05:28 +0000, Baesken, Matthias wrote: > > The only reason why a 0 was observed, was because the cgroup interface > > files were missing and the old code mapped that to a 0. That's no > > longer the case and, thus, it seems it would make the code clearer if > > it wouldn't be there any more. > > > > I don't feel strongly about this, though, and can just drop this patch. > > Hi Severin, thanks for clarification, I'm fine with the patch !
Thanks for the review, Matthias. Cheers, Severin
