On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 16:02:55 GMT, Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Can I please get a review for this patch which proposes to implement the 
>> enhancement request noted in 
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173970?
>> 
>> The commit in this PR introduces the `-o` and `--output-dir` option to the 
>> `jar` command. The option takes a path to a destination directory as a value 
>> and extracts the contents of the jar into that directory. This is an 
>> optional option and the changes in the commit continue to maintain backward 
>> compatibility where the jar is extracted into current directory, if no `-o` 
>> or `--output-dir` option has been specified.
>> 
>> As far as I know, there hasn't been any discussion on what the name of this 
>> new option should be. I was initially thinking of using `-d` but that is 
>> currently used by the `jar` command for a different purpose. So I decided to 
>> use `-o` and `--output-dir`. This is of course open for change depending on 
>> any suggestions in this PR.
>> 
>> The commit in this PR also updates the `jar.properties` file which contains 
>> the English version of the jar command's `--help` output. However, no 
>> changes have been done to the internationalization files corresponding to 
>> this one (for example: `jar_de.properties`), because I don't know what 
>> process needs to be followed to have those files updated (if at all they 
>> need to be updated).
>> 
>> The commit also includes a jtreg testcase which verifies the usage of this 
>> new option.
>
> I think the summary is that we've converged on -C/--dir. We might have to 
> tweak the usage message for -C so that it starts with the existing "Change to 
> the specified directory ..." rather than changing it to start with the 
> extract case.
> Are you, or Lance, going to create the CSR for this?

A CSR for this enhancement has now been created 
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8264510

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2752

Reply via email to