On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 10:25:44 GMT, Lance Andersen <lan...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Hi Lance， >> Thanks a lot for your review. I will update the PR ASAP. >> May I ask your help to also review the CSR？ Thanks! >> >> BRs, >> Lin > > Hi Lin, > > On Mar 24, 2021, at 2:51 AM, Lin Zang ***@***.******@***.***>> wrote: > > > > Hi Lance， > Thanks a lot for your review. I will update the PR ASAP. > May I ask your help to also review the CSR？ > > I believe we need to flush out some of the issues I raised that were not test > related as they will result in updates to the javadoc which will require an > update to the CSR. > > > > Thanks! > > BRs, > Lin > > — > You are receiving this because you commented. > Reply to this email directly, view it on > GitHub<https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/3072#issuecomment-805549600>, or > unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQPFO5R4INTAUFZ3QS6WL3TFGDXHANCNFSM4ZMLU6SA>. > > ***@***.*** > > > > Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037 > Oracle Java Engineering > 1 Network Drive > Burlington, MA 01803 > ***@***.******@***.***> Dear @LanceAndersen, Here I added a class `GZIPHeaderData` which is defined to hold all gzip header members, and make it an argument of the GZIPOutputStream constructor. Would you like to help review and check whether this change looks reasonable? BTW, this pr still lack of the negative test cases, I plan to add it when the constructor API is fixed. Thanks! Lin ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3072
