On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 10:25:44 GMT, Lance Andersen <lan...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Lin Zang has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional >> commits since the last revision: >> >> - update copyright >> - reuse arguments constructor for non-argument one. > > Hi Lin, > > On Mar 24, 2021, at 2:51 AM, Lin Zang ***@***.******@***.***>> wrote: > > > > Hi Lance， > Thanks a lot for your review. I will update the PR ASAP. > May I ask your help to also review the CSR？ > > I believe we need to flush out some of the issues I raised that were not test > related as they will result in updates to the javadoc which will require an > update to the CSR. > > > > Thanks! > > BRs, > Lin > > — > You are receiving this because you commented. > Reply to this email directly, view it on > GitHub<https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/3072#issuecomment-805549600>, or > unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQPFO5R4INTAUFZ3QS6WL3TFGDXHANCNFSM4ZMLU6SA>. > > ***@***.*** > > > > Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037 > Oracle Java Engineering > 1 Network Drive > Burlington, MA 01803 > ***@***.******@***.***> Dear Lance(@LanceAndersen), I have updated the CSR at https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8263793, which considered changes both for GZIPOutputStream and GZIPInputStream. Would you like to help check whether it looks reasonable? I also did some investigation recently, and it shows there are rare cases that the optional fields are used in gzip file, and gunzip ingores them when uncompressing. So I believe the meaning of the PR is just to add the ability of setting/getting gzip file header info that defined in gzip specification. As the use case is rare at present, I am not sure whether it is acceptable to have this PR. Thanks, Lin ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3072
