On Wed, 5 May 2021 11:05:11 GMT, Jan Lahoda <[email protected]> wrote:
>> src/jdk.compiler/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/jvm/ClassWriter.java line
>> 1704:
>>
>>> 1702: if (Feature.REDUNDANT_STRICTFP.allowedInSource(source))
>>> 1703: result = result & ~STRICTFP;
>>> 1704:
>>
>> Nitpick: Doing in Rome as ... would mean this is better written as
>>
>> result &= ~STRICTFP;
>>
>> to be in harmony with the code in the vicinity
>>
>> Also I am OK with the feature-allowed-in-source-check, but wonder if it is
>> an overkill for smaller focussed changes like this one. I will say I don't
>> know what is the standard operating procedure. See that elsewhere in
>> Lint.java you are doing
>>
>> if (source.compareTo(Source.JDK17) >= 0) {
>> values.add(LintCategory.STRICTFP);
>> }
>
> IMO it is better to have an enum constant in Feature for source level changes.
>
> But here, I wonder if a Target method on this place wouldn't be more
> appropriate. One can write:
>
> javac -source 16 -targete 17 Test.java
>
>
> If `Test.java` contains `strictfp`, should the classfile have `STRICTFP` set
> or not?
Suggestions taken.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3831
