On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 15:55:59 GMT, Aleksei Efimov <aefi...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> * `InetAddressResolverProvider.Configuration` interface API might evolve, > e.g. there might be a need to pass additional configuration items. > * local hostname is a dynamic information, therefore it cannot be passed as > string parameter to `InetAddressResolverProvider::get`. Right, I think we've ended up with a good model here that supports the common case, stacking, and can be extended in the future to add new configuration if required. Also if good use-cases come up when Configuration can be changed to be non-sealed. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5822
