On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 01:07:52 GMT, Mark Sheppard <mshep...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Rob McKenna has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Allow the test to pass on MacOSX
>
> src/java.naming/share/classes/com/sun/jndi/ldap/LdapClientFactory.java line
> 70:
>
>> 68: public PooledConnection createPooledConnection(PoolCallback pcb,
>> long timeout)
>> 69: throws NamingException {
>> 70: return new LdapClient(host, port, socketFactory,
>
> any need to perform sanity check against erroneous negative values on the
> timeout supplied here and in other parts of the solution
Hmmm... Good point. I had looked into this yesterday when I reviewed - and
AFAIU a value <= 0 would be interpreted as no timeout (that is, infinite
timeout) - and that seems consistent throughout. It's non obvious - but I
convinced myself that passing a negative value here would not necessarily be an
error, and would work as expected. However the narrowing down of a negative
long to an int doesn't necessarily preserve the sign.
@robm-openjdk the conversion from long to int probably needs to also take care
of values that are < Integer.MIN_VALUE.
jshell> long l = Integer.MIN_VALUE * 2L
l ==> -4294967296
jshell> int x = (int)l
x ==> 0
jshell> long l = Integer.MIN_VALUE * 2L + 1
l ==> -4294967295
jshell> int x = (int)l
x ==> 1
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6568
