On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 17:07:37 GMT, Mark Sheppard <mshep...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Good point. I think its better to deal with the casts at the edges since the >> timeout handling will use long by default. > > yes a redeclaration of timeout with a type long across the component would > be a consistent approach, also so just to clarify, we're not taking the approach to homogenise the timeout declarations, throughout the component, to be of type long? which would see LdapClientFactory constructor take a long timeout and timeout member varaiables be redefined as long ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6568
