On Sun, 1 May 2022 14:35:28 GMT, Rémi Forax <fo...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Address review comments
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/FutureTask.java line 222:
>
>> 220: throw new IllegalStateException("Task has not
>> completed");
>> 221: }
>> 222: }
>
> I think the code will be more readable if a switch expression and the arrow
> syntax are used
>
>
> return switch(state()) {
> case SUCCESS -> {
> @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
> V result = (V) outcome;
> yield result;
> }
> case FAILED -> throw new IllegalStateException("Task completed with
> exception");
> ...
> };
Sorry, I don't understand how it would be more readable. I like new switch
features because they extend the range of applicability of switch. But this
(and the two others) are just plain vanilla enum-based switches that were
handled well, and seem to have the same numbers of lines and structure either
way?
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8490
