> I ran `codespell` on modules owned by core-libs, and accepted those changes 
> where it indeed discovered real typos.
> 
> I will update copyright years using a script before pushing (otherwise like 
> every second change would be a copyright update, making reviewing much 
> harder).
> 
> The long term goal here is to make tooling support for running `codespell`. 
> The trouble with automating this is of course all false positives. But before 
> even trying to solve that issue, all true positives must be fixed. Hence this 
> PR.

Magnus Ihse Bursie has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
additional commit since the last revision:

  Update copyright year

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8364/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8364/files/8bc35edb..7dc7f653

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=8364&range=03
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=8364&range=02-03

  Stats: 86 lines in 86 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 86 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8364.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/8364/head:pull/8364

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8364

Reply via email to