> Hi,
> 
> This patch optimises the matching rules for floating-point comparison with 
> respects to eq/ne on x86-64
> 
> 1, When the inputs of a comparison is the same (i.e `isNaN` patterns), `ZF` 
> is always set, so we don't need `cmpOpUCF2` for the eq/ne cases, which 
> improves the sequence of `If (CmpF x x) (Bool ne)` from
> 
>     ucomiss xmm0, xmm0
>     jp      label
>     jne     label
> 
> into
> 
>     ucomiss xmm0, xmm0
>     jp      label
> 
> 2, The move rules for `cmpOpUCF2` is missing, which makes patterns such as `x 
> == y ? 1 : 0` to fall back to `cmpOpU`, which have a really high cost of 
> fixing the flags, such as
> 
>         xorl    ecx, ecx
>         ucomiss xmm0, xmm1
>         jnp     done
>         pushf
>         andq    [rsp], 0xffffff2b
>         popf
>     done:
>         movl    eax, 1
>         cmovel  eax, ecx
> 
> The patch changes this sequence into
> 
>     xorl    ecx, ecx
>     ucomiss xmm0, xmm1
>     movl    eax, 1
>     cmovpl  eax, ecx
>     cmovnel eax, ecx
> 
> 3, The patch also changes the pattern of `isInfinite` to be more optimised by 
> using `Math.abs` to reduce 1 comparison and compares the result with 
> `MAX_VALUE` since `>` is more optimised than `==` for floating-point types.
> 
> The benchmark results are as follow:
> 
>                                                      Before              After
>     Benchmark                      Mode  Cnt     Score     Error    Score     
> Error   Unit   Ratio
>     FPComparison.equalDouble       avgt    5  2876.242 ±  58.875  594.636 ±   
> 8.922  ns/op    4.84
>     FPComparison.equalFloat        avgt    5  3062.430 ±  31.371  663.849 ±   
> 3.656  ns/op    4.61
>     FPComparison.isFiniteDouble    avgt    5   475.749 ±  19.027  518.309 ± 
> 107.352  ns/op    0.92
>     FPComparison.isFiniteFloat     avgt    5   506.525 ±  14.417  515.576 ±  
> 14.669  ns/op    0.98
>     FPComparison.isInfiniteDouble  avgt    5  1232.800 ±  31.677  621.185 ±  
> 11.935  ns/op    1.98
>     FPComparison.isInfiniteFloat   avgt    5  1234.708 ±  70.239  623.566 ±  
> 15.206  ns/op    1.98
>     FPComparison.isNanDouble       avgt    5  2255.847 ±   7.238  400.124 ±   
> 0.762  ns/op    5.64
>     FPComparison.isNanFloat        avgt    5  2567.044 ±  36.078  546.486 ±   
> 1.509  ns/op    4.70
> 
> Thank you very much.

Quan Anh Mai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
commit since the last revision:

  comments

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8525/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8525/files/ba93dcf2..7fcfe4a3

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=8525&range=02
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=8525&range=01-02

  Stats: 11 lines in 1 file changed: 10 ins; 0 del; 1 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8525.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/8525/head:pull/8525

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8525

Reply via email to