On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 21:21:25 GMT, liach <d...@openjdk.java.net> wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/module/ModuleDescriptor.java line 167: >> >>> 165: * but is optional in the dynamic phase, during execution. >>> 166: */ >>> 167: STATIC(AccessFlag.STATIC.mask()), >> >> This is actually `AccessFlag.STATIC_PHASE` (`0x0040`), and not >> `AccessFlag.STATIC` (`0x0008`): >> Suggestion: >> >> STATIC(AccessFlag.STATIC_PHASE.mask()), > >> In the current hodgepodge AccessFlag, we have STATIC and STATIC_PHASE, and >> the incorrect ModuleDescriptor.accessFlags().contains(AccessFlag.STATIC) >> call is much more subtle, especially to new users of this class. Arguably, >> this misuse would be way worse than that in the distinct enum case. > > Oops, didn't know this already happened. Good spot right there. Corrected to STATIC_PHASE in subsequent push; thanks. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/7445
