On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 08:02:49 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Yep, it was renamed since the file is also named VISCPP, and I felt that >> matching the names was a good style change > > I think it is the file that has the "bad" name in this case. :( But okay. I also think the macro name should be left alone. It's the file suffix that is "bad", though I'm not convinced it's so bad as to be worth changing. (There's also `TARGET_COMPILER_visCPP`.) ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11081
